Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2020.(6): 58-67
https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2020.06.058

Yulia V. Didenko
Scientific Management Department of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1198-6157

Anna I. Radchenko
Publishing House "Akademperiodyka" of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0276-6398

Miroslava V. Yazvynska
Scientific Management Department of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1074-7525

PARTICIPATION IN THE WORK OF EDITORIAL BOARDS OF SCIENTIFIC JOURNALS IS A WAY TO INCREASE THE RATING OF A PERIODICAL

The article considers issues related to the involvement of Ukrainian scientists in the activities of editorial boards of foreign scientific periodicals, as well as the participation of foreign scientists in the work of editorial boards of Ukrainian scientific journals. It is obvious that such international cooperation should have a positive effect on expanding the circle of authors and readers of a publication, the visibility of a journal in the world information space and its ratings. However, the analysis showed a certain imbalance: there’re more foreign scientists in the editorial boards of journals of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine than Ukrainian scientists in the editorial boards of foreign journals. In addition, the low share of articles by foreign authors in Ukrainian periodicals may indicate a lack of active participation of foreign scholars in the work of academic journals, i.e. the likelihood of their formal membership in editorial boards. Thus, in some cases, the involvement of foreign experts is not the result of a conscious editorial policy aimed at increasing the rating and scientific impact of the journal, but rather an attempt to meet the requirements of certification bodies.
Keywords: publishing, editorial board, editorial policy, foreign members of editorial boards.

Language of article: ukrainian

Full text (PDF)

REFERENCES

  1. Yurevich M.A., Erkina D.S. "Publication rally": direct threat or opportunity for scientific community? Sociology of Science and Technology. 2017. 8(2): 104–117 (in Russian).
  2. Didenko Yu.V., Radchenko A.I. Publication activity as a way of scientific communication and ratings race. Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2017. (9): 82–98. (in Ukrainian). DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/visn2017.09.082
  3. Yankova I., Dentchev S., Peteva I., Stancheva S. Model for achieving the indicators for influence in scientific areas of Bulgarian academic journals. Qualitative & Quantitative Methods in Libraries. 2016. 5(4): 829–835. http://qqml-journal.net/index.php/qqml/article/view/8/8
  4. Kotlyarevsky Ya.V., Radchenko A.I., Melnikov O.V., Semenyuk E.P. Strategic Priorities in Measuring the Publication and Publishing Works in Scholarly Research Activity. Nauka innov. 2018. 14(5): 5–18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/scin14.05.005
  5. Mazov N.A., Gureev V.N., Metelkin D.V. Bibliometric Indicators of Scientific Journals and Editorial Board Members (Based on the Example of Russian Journals on Earth Sciences). Sci. Tech. Inf. Proc. 2018. 45: 271–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688218040123
  6. Nabout J.C., Teresa F.B., Machado K.B., Prado V.H.M., Bini L.M., Diniz-Filho J.A.F. Do traditional scientometric indicators predict social media activity on scientific knowledge? An analysis of the ecological literature. Scientometrics. 2018. 115: 1007–1015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2678-X
  7. Breugelmans J.G., Roberge G., Tippett C., Durning M., Struck D.B., Makanga M.M. Scientific impact increases when researchers publish in open access and international collaboration: A bibliometric analysis on poverty-related disease papers. PLoS ONE. 2018. 13(9): e0203156. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203156
  8. Gonzalez-Alcaide G., Park J., Huamanо A.C., Ramos J.M. Dominance and leadership in research activities: Collaboration between countries of differing human development is reflected through authorship order and designation as corresponding authors in scientific publications. PLoS ONE. 2017. 12(8): e0182513. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0182513
  9. Petersen A.M. Megajournal mismanagement: Manuscript decision bias and anomalous editor activity at PLOS ONE. Journal of Informetrics. 2019. 13(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2019.100974
  10. Konnov V.I., Yurevich M.A. Quoting tendencies in Russian and foreign psychological journals. Voprosy Psychologii. 2014. (2): 42–51. (in Russian).
  11. Demidov D., Chavykin Y. Evaluating national library and information journals on the citation basis. Scientific and Technical Libraries. 2018. (11): 20–33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33186/1027-3689-2018-11-20-33 
  12. Yan E., Din I.N. Weighted citation: indicator of prestige articles. Mezhdunarodnyi forum po informatsii (International Information Forum). 2011. (2): 19–27. (in Russian).]
  13. Liu Weishu, Li Yanchao. Open access publications in sciences and social sciences: A comparative analysis. Learned Publishing. 2018. 31(2): 107–119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1114