Visn. Nac. Akad. Nauk Ukr. 2018. (4):53-67

S.Ye. Saukh
Pukhov Institute for Modelling in Energy Engineering of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv

According to the materials of scientific report at the meeting of the Presidium of NAS of Ukraine, February 28, 2018

The report analyzes world tendencies in the development of energy complexes modeling systems and the possibility of using existing systems in modern conditions of decentralized management of energy complexes. The requirements for ensuring the adequacy of energy complexes modeling systems in market conditions are formulated. A generalized mathematical model of the competitive equilibrium on the electricity market in the form of a system of nonlinear programming problems and its equivalent form — a complementary problem — is presented. On the base of computational experiments power markets modeling, significant limitations on using well-known solvers of complementary problems are identified. Original methods of solving large-scale complementary problems are presented and the advantages of the solver created on the base of such methods are shown. The particulars in the application of the modeling methodology for the construction of adequate mathematical models of energy markets and the advantages of the proposed methods for solving complementary problems are demonstrated through the test problems of modeling the equilibrium states of the electricity market of Ukraine as well as united electricity market of Benelux countries, France and Germany.
Keywords: energy market, equilibrium state, modeling methodology, complementary problem, solver of large-scale complementary problems, computational experiment.

Language of article: ukrainian



  1. Jebaraja S., Iniyan S. A review of energy models. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. 2006. 10(4): 281.
  2. Connolly D., Lund H., Mathiesen B.V., Leahy M. A review of computer tools for analysing the integration of renewable energy into various energy systems. Applied Energy. 2010. 87(4): 1059.
  3. Amerighi O., Ciorba U., Tommasino M.C. Inventory and characterization of existing tools. D2.1 ATEsT Models Characterization Report. (Italian National Agency for New Technologies, 2010).
  4. Pina A.A. Supply and Demand Dynamics in Energy Systems Modeling. PhD Thesis. (Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 2012).
  5. Beeck N. Classification of Energy Models. Tech. report FEW 777. (Tilburg University & Eindhoven University of Technology, 1999).
  6. Daniels D. Overview of the National Energy Modeling System (NEMS). U.S. Energy Information Administration, 2017.
  7. PLEXOS® Integrated Energy Model.
  8. PRIMES MODEL 2013–2014. Detailed model description. (E3MLab/ICCS at National Technical University of Athens).
  9. Parkkonen O. Customer benefits of Demand-Side Management in the Nordic electricity market. PhD Thesis: (Jyväskylä University School of Business and Economics, 2016).
  10. NEMSIM: the National Electricity Market simulator.
  11. Hogan W.W. Energy Policy Models for Project Independence. Computers & Operations Research. 1975. 2(3): 251.
  12. Gabriel S.A., Kydes A.S., Whitman P. The National Energy Modeling System: A Large-Scale Energy-Economic Equilibrium Model. Operations Research. 2001. 49(1): 14.
  13. Murphy F.H., Susan J.C., Shaw S.H., Sanders R. Modeling and forecasting energy markets with the intermediate future forecasting system. Operations Research. 1988. 36(3): 406.
  14. Integrating Module of the National Energy Modeling System: Model Documentation. U.S. Energy Information Administration. 2014.
  15. Overview of the Energy and Power Evaluation Program (ENPEP-BALANCE). Center for Energy, Environmental, and Economic Systems Analysis (CEEESA). Argonne National Laboratory.
  16. Nesbitt D., Calvez А. Network Agent Based modeling for EIA. 2014.
  17. Bernarda F., Viellec M. GEMINI-E3, a general equilibrium model of international-national interactions between economy, energy and the environment. Computational Management Science. 2008. 5(3): 173.
  18. PRIMES MODEL. Version 2 Energy System Model: Design and features. E3Mlab – ICCS / National Technical University of Athens.
  19. Qi T., Winchester N., Zhang D., Zhang X., Karplus V.J. The China-in-Global Energy Model. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. MA, USA. Tsinghua University. Beijing, China, 2014.
  20. Dirkse S., Ferris M.C., Munson T. The PATH Solver. University of Wisconsin.
  21. Dirkse S.P., Ferris M.C. The PATH solver: A non-monotone stabilization scheme for mixed complementarity problems. Optimization Methods and Software. 1995. 5(2):123.
  22. Dirkse S.P., Ferri M.C. A pathsearch damped Newton method for computing general equilibria. University of Wisconsin. Madison, Wisconsin, 1994.
  23. Billups S.C., Dirkse S.P., Ferris M.C. A comparison of large scale mixed complementarity problem solvers. Computational Optimization and Applications. 1997. 7(1): 3.
  24. Hobbs B.F. Linear Complementarity Models of Nash–Cournot Competition in Bilateral and POOLCO Power Markets. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems. 2001. 16(2). 10.1109/59.918286
  25. Murphy F., Smeers Y. On the Impact of Forward Markets on Investments in Oligopolistic Markets with Reference to Electricity. Harvard Electricity Policy Group Research Paper, 2007. Operations Research. 2010. 58(3): 515. Part 2. Uncertain Demand.
  26. Pineau P.-O. Electricity market reforms: Industrial developments, investment dynamics and game modeling. Ph.D. Thesis. (Montreal). 2000.
  27. Murphy F., Smeers Y. Generation capacity expansion in imperfectly competitive restructured electricity markets. Operations Research. 2005. 53(4): 646.
  28. Hobbs B., Helman U. Complementarity-Based Equilibrium Modeling for Electric Power Markets. In: Modeling Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets. Series in Financial Economics. (Chichester, Wiley, 2004).
  29. Borisenko A.V., Saukh S.Ye., Modeling of equilibrium state of electric power systems in market conditions. In: Simulation-2008: Proc. Int. Conf. (14-16 May, 2008, Kiev, Ukraine).
  30. Borisenko A.V., Saukh S.Ye., Model of market equilibrium in the electric power sector of Ukraine. News of the energy complex. 2009. (5): 29.
  31. Borisenko A.V., Saukh S.Ye. Equilibrium model for the introduction of generating capacities in conditions of imperfect competition. News of the energy complex. 2009. (11): 36. (12): 23.
  32. Borisenko A.V., Saukh S.Ye., Model of functioning and development of generating capacities in market conditions. Works of the Institute of Electrodynamics of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. 2010. 25: 21.
  33. Saukh S.Ye., Borysenko A.V. Equilibrium model of Ukrainian generating capacities operation and development under market conditions. In: Energy of Russia in XXI century: development strategy: Proc. conf. (Irkutsk: Melentiev Energy Systems Institute, SB RAS, 2010).
  34. Saukh S.Ye. Methods of computer simulation of competitive equilibrium in electricity markets. Electronic modeling. 2013. 35(5): 11.
  35. Energy Research Centre of the Netherlands. COMPETES input data.
  36. Saukh S.Ye. Method of correction of special elements in Clarke’s generalized Jacobian to ensure numerical stability of the quasi-Newton methods for solution of variational inequalities problems. Electronic modeling. 2015. 37(4): 3.
  37. Saukh S.Ye. Application of incomplete column-row factorization of matrices in quasi-Newton methods for solving large-scale variational inequalities problems. Electronic modeling. 2015. 37(5): 3.
  38. Fischer A. A special Newton-type optimization method. Optimization. 1992. 24(3-4): 269.
  39. Facchinei F., Pang J.-S. Finite-dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems. Vol. 1. (Springer, 2003).
  40. Facchinei F., Pang J.-S. Finite-dimensional Variational Inequalities and Complementarity Problems. Vol. 2. (Springer, 2003).
  41. Saukh S.Ye. CR-factorization method for large dimensional matrices. Electronic modeling. 2007. 29(6): 3.
  42. Saukh S.Ye. Incomplete column-row factorization of matrices for solving of large-scale system of equations. Electronic modeling. 2010. 32(6): 3.
  43. Anderson S.C. Analyzing strategic interaction in multi-settlement electricity markets: A closed-loop supply function equilibrium model. (Harvard University, 2004).
  44. Saukh S.Ye., Borisenko A.V., Jigun E.N. Model of the network of high-voltage transmission lines in the tasks of planning of the development of power systems. Electronic modeling. 2014. 36(4): 3.
  45. Wei J.-Y., Smeers Y. Spatial Oligopolistic Electricity Models with Cournot Generators and Regulated Transmission Prices. Operations Research. 1999. 47(1): 102.
  46. Saukh S.Ye., Borisenko A.V. Modeling of competitive equilibrium at the electricity market with regard for energy losses in electric networks. The Problems of General Energy. 2016. 46(3): 5.